Black Lives Matter.
Black Lives Matter.
This blog supports [insert current topical issue here].
On June 2nd 2020, like anyone else who happened
to open any form of social media, I was met with a sea of black squares. Much
to my confusion, I quickly became aware that a modernistic, peaceful protest
had erupted across popular sites such as Facebook and Instagram.
#BlackOutTuesday had begun. And this got me thinking. For as long as I can
remember, I have always felt somewhat uneasy about large-scale mass showings of
support for popular social movements that seem to come and go as the months
pass by. There is always a feint feeling of falseness that taints them all,
which I slowly grew wary of.
Every year when June rolls around, and I look forwards to
seeing anyone affiliated with the LGBTQ+ community parading their freedom to be
who they truly are, matched with a celebration of how far society has come in
finally accepting the fact that love is love. Again however, something never
quite feels right. Everywhere I look, I am bombarded with a company brandishing
their newly-customised rainbow-covered product of advertisement. And it is
exactly that. Advertising. It is these token gestures that are released
to ensure that customers understand that Costa Coffee is 100% pro-LGBT, or that
Deliveroo loves how same-sex marriage is now legalised. But who do these
gestures actually help? These feeble acts are nothing more than vain attempts
at seeming woke and up to date, while bowing to consumerism, albeit with a tad
more colour. Politicising products in this way does nothing to help the actual
causes the LGBT community fights for.
Which brings me to the recent Black Lives Matter protests.
Large brands and popular companies will always seek the approval of their
customer base, and align their views in whichever way will earn them the most
money. But this is tricky business, meaning they have to second guess and
predict which views their customers will have and which movements to back.
Pride month? Let’s stick a rainbow on whatever we can. Current BLM protests?
Make all our platforms black. What else can we suck up to in order to stay
current? All this does is create a set of spineless companies doing whatever
they think they should be doing, in order to not lose money. And this reduces vital activism to nothing but a money-making ploy.
And the same token gestures spread further, into the realm
of the media stars and influencers. J.K. Rowling recently has been criticised for
her ‘anti-LGBT’ comments, by her former Harry Potter stars. What else were they
meant to say? If Daniel Radcliffe ever wants to be hired for any film ever
again, he has to put whatever true feelings he has to one side, and veer towards
an aggressive neutrality. If he doesn’t, both he and any employer that hires
him will be deemed not-anti-LGBT, and probably branded a fascist. How
ridiculous. Furthermore, any TV channel to display reruns of Little Britain or
Come Fly with Me will now be deemed not-anti-racist, and therefore racist. Calls
of ‘blackfacing’ in this case are simply just untrue. If you call such acts
‘blackface’, then you truly have not grasped its history in the media. Which
physical characteristics is an actor or actress not allowed to alter?
Can David Walliams play a lady? Can he brandish a blond wig? Pretend to be fat?
Is Matt Lucas the only one of the pair allowed to joke about baldness? Similar
pointless outrages have surfaced recently with communities being disgusted at
straight actors playing gay characters. Where is the line to be drawn?
What has driven me to this article, is that our society is
still inherently racist towards anyone who is not white. Around the world,
there are some amazing fights to realign the world we live in to remove this
problem. What infuriates me is that so many people only ever chose to support
these movements when it is popular and fashionable to do so. So many are
lucky enough to know a life with very few struggles that affect every perceivable aspect of life. And this occurs in
ignorance. For those who struggle daily to be accepted for who they are, purely because of a different skin colour, they do not possess that luxury. And that
is white privilege.
I feel like I've written these articles.
ReplyDelete